Just one day after the Bondi terror attack, the Labor government made a bold and potentially divisive move: quietly introducing diversity quotas for lawyers representing the Commonwealth. But here’s where it gets controversial—Attorney-General Michelle Rowland not only raised gender targets but also expanded a suite of diversity measures, sparking questions about timing and priorities. Was this a strategic step toward inclusivity, or a misstep in the shadow of tragedy? SUBSCRIBE to dive deeper into this unfolding story.
For a limited time, unlock a wealth of insights and more at an unbeatable price. Here’s what you’ll get:
- Unlimited access to our app and website, so you never miss a beat.
- A digital version of today’s paper, delivered straight to your device.
- Daily puzzles and Mind Games, including crosswords and sudoku, to keep your mind sharp.
- Full digital access to The Wall Street Journal, broadening your perspective with global news.
- Subscriber-exclusive newsletters and early access to tomorrow’s front pages, keeping you ahead of the curve.
No lock-in contracts, just flexibility. Choose from two incredible offers:
Option 1: $1 a week for 4 weeks
($4 minimum cost). After that, $44 is charged every 4 weeks. Read the fine print.
Option 2: Lock in & save for less than $1 a day
$6.50 a week for the first 12 months ($338 minimum cost), charged as $26 every 4 weeks. After the first year, $26 is charged every 4 weeks. Read the fine print.
Benefits of Full Digital Access:
- Expert news and commentary, available anytime on the web or app.
- Swipe through the digital newspaper, liftouts, and archives for a seamless reading experience.
- Subscriber-exclusive news emails to keep you informed.
- Complimentary access to The Wall Street Journal for a global perspective.
- Daily crosswords, sudoku, and more with Mind Games to keep you entertained.
And this is the part most people miss—while diversity in legal representation is a noble goal, the timing of this move raises questions. Is this a genuine push for equality, or a calculated distraction? Weigh in below—do you think this was the right move, or should the focus have remained solely on the aftermath of the Bondi attack? Let’s spark a conversation!
